Articles Main

Peter's Articles

A Conference for the __People, by the People, __and At the People?
A Sign of Hope
As Goes the Follower; So __Goes the Leader
A Time To Heal

A Word in Support of __Suppliers
Back to the End of the Line
Be Careful What You Ask for
Caring About Place
Conference Calling
Conversations for a Change
Creating New Futures Through Community Conversations
Food for Thought
Freedom’s Just Another __Word
Hard Measures for Human __Values
Homeward Bound
Hope is Where You Find it
How’s it Going
In Praise of C-SPAN
It’s About Time
Large Ideas Expressed in __Small Movements

Let’s Give Them Something __to Talk About
Let’s Go to the Oasis
Movable Chairs
My Way is the Highway Once Around the Block
On The Streets Where We __Live
Quality, Wherefore Art __Thou?

Reframing The Debate
Remembering What Matters
Reality What a Concept
Safe Return Doubtful
Servant-Leadership
__ Conference
Strategy for Civic __Engagement
The Board Score
The Hunt for Next __November
The Oversight Fallacy
Total Quantity __Management
Trust in Whom
Turnabout is Fair Play
What a Difference a Space __Makes
When Change is No Change __at All
Y2K Calling
Y2K, Oh

WWW
 

Consulting Skills in Action

Engineering Impact

Gaining Client Commitment

The New Role for Human Resource Staff

Making Quality Happen

Making Quality Happen - II

Trainers Become Full Partners

 

Other Articles

Embracing Stewardship

Interview with Peter Block

Leading Change From Within

Peter Koestenbaum on Peter Block

Tips for Successful Consulting

Transformation Needed In Ethics
 

More From Peter

Peter's Morning Talk.mp3
 

Want to comment on an article by Peter? Or respond to a reader's comments?  Click here.

 

Reality What a Concept
By Peter Block

Every change effort is a political act. Whenever we create teams, redo a work process, or change the role of managers, we are touching a control structure that would rather be left alone. Change is difficult because it requires that we raise our political consciousness about the subtle ways power is exercised.

The Name of the Game

Those who define the rules, control the game. Power becomes the ability to define reality for others. When we allow others to define reality for us, we have yielded sovereignty and lost the game before it has begun. And we do this all the time.
 

I was in Nassau, Bahamas last fall
and
lucky to hear a local architect, named Jackson Burnside, talk about how the British had defined the Bahamian culture during their colonial period. He described how the British maintained power by enforcing the British definition of what was true and false. The most vivid example was about how you draw the color of skin.

When Burnside, a person of color, went to school, he was taught that flesh tones were pink. The crayons labeled "flesh" were not brown, they were pink. When the students filled in a coloring book, they were expected to use this pink "flesh color" on the face and arms of the children in the book. Burnside remembers how upset he and the teacher became when one of the other students used brown to color the face and arms. Despite the fact that his skin was brown, the color of the colonial British skin, pink, defined what color to use. The message was not subtle: the institutionally approved color of skin was pink, not brown. Pink became the standard against which skin was measured. Pink skin was "normal", brown skin was not.

Power is claimed by the capacity to define what is real and to determine the standards against which we are measured. We yield power by believing those definitions of reality and standards. Some examples in our world:

Government is in Charge
If you listen to the media, it seems that politicians actually govern. We are sold the idea that Washington, D.C. runs the country and so what happens there is important. Governors are supposed to run states, mayors and city councils run our city. If we as citizens ever decided that we governed, we might change our perspective on politicians. We might even treat them as if they were not so important.

Technology Rules
We are told that technology is going to define our future. Bill Gates is the prophet who knows what tomorrow is going to look like. Just because I can place a television, a computer, and a telephone on my wrist does not mean that my life is going to improve. It may be that technology causes as many problems as it solves. Yet we let those who have an economic interest in the importance of technology make it the centerpiece on the table.

How Much Is Enough?
We allow top management to define the economic game we need to play. The CEO of a large regional bank announces that earnings need to reach $10 per share and therefore $40 million dollars in cost savings are required. We immediately begin to look for the money. When do we start to respond by saying, "show me the numbers." It is through our collective silence that we end up trying to justify a year in which thousands of people were laid off and the institution had record profits.

Behavior Training
If you have been to a training session in the last ten years, you have filled out a questionnaire that told that you that you were an INFJ, a control taker, a support giver, a socializer, an integrator, and that you are either task or people driven. We let this characterize our tendencies and in the same breath, by omission, define our deficiencies and what we need to work on.

Stock Market
Finally, because corporations dominate this culture, we have come to believe that the stock market is the measure of our success. If the market is doing well, and corporations are making money, we must be doing well. What is lost in this definition of what is real are the millions of people in low pay and low value jobs and the pockets of the population where the unemployment rate stays in double digits.

--The problem is not that others wish to define reality for us. The problem is our consent. When we say yes to management or the dominant culture's definition of what is real and important, we have yielded sovereignty over our sense of ourselves and our capacity for self-directed local action. When I believe that pink skin is more appropriate than brown skin, I have supported the colonists and surrendered my ability to define for myself who I am, how I define success and what cultural values I would choose to create and live by. And if you think the colonists only fly a foreign flag, how about the days when pink Band-Aids were also labeled "flesh."

This article appeared in News for a Change published by AQP in March 1998

   

Home

© 2008 All Rights Reserved. Designed Learning Inc. Contact Us