Total Quantity Management
By Peter Block
It seems the quality
movement is in remission. It is a passing worth noting. We now live in a
quantitative period where measurement has triumphed over meaning. In
1891, William Thompson, Lord Kelvin wrote:
--“I
often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about and
express it in numbers you know something about it; but when you cannot
measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of
a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
--I
never personally met Lord Kelvin, but I hear his voice all the time. We
have come to believe that if you cannot measure something, it is not
real and perhaps does not exist. You hear statements such as, “What you
measure are the results you get.” I heard of a vision statement for a
staff group that said their core values were: trust, respect and
accurate gauging. I love the term—accurate gauging. It evokes the image
of a machine shop; minute measurements, hard edges, vises and low
tolerances. Sounds like the workplace of the 90s.
A Circle of Quality
The quality movement began with a different spirit. The efforts in total
quality began with the growth of quality circles; a weekly meeting of
workers discussing ways to improve service, lower costs and reduce
errors. Everyone recognized that the meeting itself was as important in
improving quality as the solutions it came up with. Something
fundamental shifted when core workers were given the time to meet,
without supervision, to come up with their own answers.
--Before
that, Quality Control and Quality Assurance were king. Management
thought that people could not be trusted to assure their own quality.
Having employees meet in a circle without the boss was somewhere between
mutiny and revolution. But revolution happened and it worked.
--This
was in an era when corporate America realized they finally had some
competition. The focus on costs, the control aspects of quality and an
indifference to customers had not been a problem in a time when
companies dominated their marketplace.
--Facing
the loss of customers, companies responded by initiating qualitative
programs that expanded the quality circle to include employee
involvement, empowerment, vision and values statements, and other
efforts that gave priority to the employee and cultural changes.
--The
focus on involvement and culture at some point took a numeric turn and
what began as a weekly conversation turned into a statistical journey.
Dialogue became tools, charts, fishbone diagrams and eventually a
competition for a national award. Quality circles might have been
wounded the moment we started to measure them. The questions became,
“How many circles are meeting? How many ideas were generated and what
was the dollar value of those ideas?” It always seemed strange that we
never asked the same questions of management meetings.
In This Corner, The
Heavyweight Champion of the World
Now that America has “won” the Cold War, declared economic victory and
Asia is on its knees, something has shifted in our thinking. The quality
focus has faded and the attention has turned to quantity. Our concern
for human value has turned to a love of size and speed. Concern for
customer service has converted to an obsession with market share.
America is so attracted to competition that it has decided to buy it.
Acquire, merge and reduce headcount to pay for it. Wealth and
shareholder value has once more become the primary measure of our
success. We don’t complain too much because so many of us are silent
beneficiaries.
Show Me the Money
This quantification not only impacted the Quality Movement, it invaded
every aspect of our lives. As a nation, we use the stock market as the
primary measure of value. When it rises we are happy, when it falls it
is front page news. Allan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve
Board, is now the most powerful man in America. When he frowns, we sell.
When he smiles we buy. If he ran for president, it would be a demotion.
--As
part of society’s number-mindedness, our communities measure themselves
on population growth. Never mind how crowded they are, or whether you
have to call a local number to find out the waiting time on the
interstate “express” way. We want more people and more housing starts. I
was at a zoning meeting recently and the lawyer for the builder said
that if the city did not let them build on the property, the land would
be rendered useless. Open land without a building, holding nothing but
grass and trees is now useless.
--At
a personal level, when we only value what we can measure, we have in
effect quantified and objectified our own selves. We refer to ourselves
as “human assets,” human “resources.” I have been decapitated so that
only my “head counts.” The primary metric for my well being has become
percentage of body fat. I have 24 percent body fat, barely within
minimum critical specifications. Every bite becomes a moral crisis.
Accurate gauging for the body requires it to be flat and firm. What
happened to round and soft?
--All
of this drains our spirit in the name of measurable results. What
happened to the Quality Movement has happened to us. In the switch to
measurement and gauging we became institutionalized. At risk is the
feeling and qualitative side of work and life—the unmeasurables such as
relationships, virtue and compassion. And what about love? If we are
looking for love in all the wrong places, as the song suggests, does
this mean we should start looking for love in the Bureau of Standards
and Measures instead of in the moonlight?
--The
stock market, housing starts and the shape and firmness of the body are
larger expressions of what broke the circles that began our movement
towards quality. They are an exaggerated belief in concreteness and
numbers that separates us from each other and from experiencing the real
meaning of quality. If focusing on facts and measurement was once the
strength of the quality movement, it now has become its liability.
Come to a Meeting
We need to rejoin the quality circle that has been broken. Our bodies
can be healthy and still round. We can find a circle of neighbors in our
community that value relationships for their own sake and the country
can work to complete a circle that would include forgiveness and
compassion.
--And
would you come to a quality circle meeting at work? No machines. Face to
face conversation for its own value. Talking about how to make this
place better and make it our own. Once a week, one hour. I’ll bring the
fat grams. If someone wants to measure the results of our meeting, fine
– just don’t make it the point.
This
article appeared in
News for a Change published by AQP in November 1998
|
